★ Post-Game Report
★
Atlantic East (5-9)HOME
2
‹Home Away›
Sep 22, 2026
United East (4-9)AWAY
1
At a Glance
Goals
2 | 1
Manhattanville · Cedar Crest
Shots
14 | 26
Manhattanville · Cedar Crest
Saves
8 | 3
Manhattanville · Cedar Crest
APC Conversion %
25% | 6.2%
Manhattanville · Cedar Crest
2 of 8 | 1 of 16
DPC Success Rate
93.8% | 75%
Manhattanville · Cedar Crest
15 of 16 | 6 of 8
Cards
0 | 5
Manhattanville · Cedar Crest
Momentum

Momentum by Period

This line tracks which team had the attacking edge each period. Goals count double the weight of shots.
Manhattanville Attacking Cedar Crest Attacking PASS BACK Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
See full period-by-period stats
Period Offense Defense Diff
M | CC
Goals For Shots For Attack PCs Goals Against Def PCs Saves
Q1
2 | 0
8 | 3
4 | 1
0 | 2
1 | 4
2 | 2
+2 | -2
Q2
0 | 0
4 | 5
3 | 3
0 | 0
3 | 3
3 | 0
+0 | +0
Q3
0 | 0
0 | 10
0 | 6
0 | 0
6 | 0
2 | 0
+0 | +0
Q4
0 | 1
2 | 8
1 | 6
1 | 0
6 | 1
1 | 1
-1 | +1
Total
2 | 1
14 | 26
8 | 16
1 | 2
16 | 8
8 | 3
+1 | -1
Penalty Corners

Attack Penalty Corners

Manhattanville
8
2
Scored
6
Blocked
25.0% success
Cedar Crest
16
1
Scored
15
Blocked
6.2% success

APCs by Period

Manhattanville Cedar Crest
4
Q1
1
3
Q2
3
0
Q3
6
1
Q4
6
Goalkeeping & Shots

Save %

88.9%
Manhattanville
60.0%
Cedar Crest

Shots & Goals Against

Manhattanville Shots Faced 26
14 Cedar Crest Shots Faced
Manhattanville SOG Faced 9
5 Cedar Crest SOG Faced
Manhattanville Goals Against 1
2 Cedar Crest Goals Against
See full defensive load by period
Period DPCs Saves Opp. Shots Opp. Goals Total Load
Q1
1 | 4
2 | 2
3 | 8
0 | 2
2 | 4
Q2
3 | 3
3 | 0
5 | 4
0 | 0
3 | 0
Q3
6 | 0
2 | 0
10 | 0
0 | 0
2 | 0
Q4
6 | 1
1 | 1
8 | 2
1 | 0
2 | 1
Total
16 | 8
8 | 3
26 | 14
1 | 2
9 | 5
Shooting Efficiency
Manhattanville
14
Total Shots
35.7%
On Target
5
Shots on Goal
40.0%
Converted
2
Goals
Cedar Crest
26
Total Shots
34.6%
On Target
9
Shots on Goal
11.1%
Converted
1
Goals
back to top