★ Post-Game Report
NESCAC (10-4)HOME
2
‹Home Away›
Oct 24, 2026
★
NESCAC (14-0)AWAY
3
At a Glance
Goals
2 | 3
Williams · Tufts
Shots
14 | 8
Williams · Tufts
Saves
5 | 8
Williams · Tufts
APC Conversion %
10% | 42.9%
Williams · Tufts
1 of 10 | 3 of 7
DPC Success Rate
57.1% | 90%
Williams · Tufts
4 of 7 | 9 of 10
Cards
1 | 1
Williams · Tufts
Momentum

Momentum by Period

This line tracks which team had the attacking edge each period. Goals count double the weight of shots.
Williams Attacking Tufts Attacking PASS BACK Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
See full period-by-period stats
Period Offense Defense Diff
W | T
Goals For Shots For Attack PCs Goals Against Def PCs Saves
Q1
1 | 1
1 | 1
0 | 2
1 | 1
2 | 0
0 | 0
+0 | +0
Q2
1 | 1
6 | 4
4 | 4
1 | 1
4 | 4
3 | 2
+0 | +0
Q3
0 | 0
3 | 0
3 | 0
0 | 0
0 | 3
0 | 2
+0 | +0
Q4
0 | 1
4 | 3
3 | 1
1 | 0
1 | 3
2 | 4
-1 | +1
Total
2 | 3
14 | 8
10 | 7
3 | 2
7 | 10
5 | 8
-1 | +1
Penalty Corners

Attack Penalty Corners

Williams
10
1
Scored
9
Blocked
10.0% success
Tufts
7
3
Scored
4
Blocked
42.9% success

APCs by Period

Williams Tufts
0
Q1
2
4
Q2
4
3
Q3
0
3
Q4
1
Goalkeeping & Shots

Save %

62.5%
Williams
80.0%
Tufts

Shots & Goals Against

Williams Shots Faced 8
14 Tufts Shots Faced
Williams SOG Faced 8
10 Tufts SOG Faced
Williams Goals Against 3
2 Tufts Goals Against
See full defensive load by period
Period DPCs Saves Opp. Shots Opp. Goals Total Load
Q1
2 | 0
0 | 0
1 | 1
1 | 1
1 | 1
Q2
4 | 4
3 | 2
4 | 6
1 | 1
4 | 3
Q3
0 | 3
0 | 2
0 | 3
0 | 0
0 | 2
Q4
1 | 3
2 | 4
3 | 4
1 | 0
3 | 4
Total
7 | 10
5 | 8
8 | 14
3 | 2
8 | 10
Shooting Efficiency
Williams
14
Total Shots
71.4%
On Target
10
Shots on Goal
20.0%
Converted
2
Goals
Tufts
8
Total Shots
100.0%
On Target
8
Shots on Goal
37.5%
Converted
3
Goals
back to top